Chris, I was able to locate the conversation/patch you are referring to. If there's a sample dataset that you can share that I can use for testing, I'd like to add a dashboard test for this so that we don't break this functionality in the future.
Utkarsh On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris, > > Do you any additional info about the patches that you are referring > to? Did they make it into Xdmf repo, but just haven't made it into > ParaView yet? > > Utkarsh > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Chris Kees <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm using XDMF for storing results of parallel unstructured finite >> element computations. I worked with some of the developers for the >> XDMF reader on getting proper display of the overlapping (ghost) >> entities a while back, but it doesn't seem like those changes were >> really merged into the trunk. Paraview 3.10 still doesn't appear to >> eliminate duplicate points and cells quite the way I would expect it >> to. Is there anybody still working on that functionality that could >> help me get some changes permanently made to paraview? I can supply >> data sets of various complexity (quad,tri,hex,tet, (bi-)quadratic, >> dynamic, etc) in a dropbox folder and am am willing to change the way >> we're organizing the information in XDMF (though if my memory serves, >> we had a patched paraview that worked fine with our current >> representation). >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> Xdmf mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xdmf >> > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
