OK if I can figure it out I will let you know.

I downloaded both versions from the Paraview downloads page.


________________________________
From: Andy Bauer [[email protected]]
Sent: August 9, 2012 17:52
To: Janusz Michalik
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Paraview] BUG?: Paraview 3.14.1 Linux 64-bit --> can not call 
GradientsOfUnstructuredDataSet through python script

I ran your script after creating a source and using the python calculator to 
create the velocity and pressure fields and didn't have any problems with 
3.14.1. If you can figure out a way to reliably reproduce the problem I can try 
to fix it.

I've never seen the QPainter warning. Did you build ParaView yourself or use an 
installer?

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Janusz Michalik 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Its really strange it took me several tries of doing the same thing to get the 
error. Just to make sure its not any typo, I used python trace to get the 
script I attached to this e-mail (test.py). As I understand it should run no 
problem in the python shell. I highlight the data set (STSone) in the pipeline 
and ran the script and still get


Traceback (most recent call last):

File "<string>", line 6, in <module>

TypeError: 'GradientOfUnstructuredDataSet' object is not callable



On a side note I'm getting this:

QPainter::begin: Paint device returned engine == 0, type: 2

QPainter::setRenderHint: Painter must be active to set rendering hints

QPainter::setBrush: Painter not active

QPainter::end: Painter not active, aborted

What is this error? It pops up periodically...

--
Janusz






________________________________
From: Andy Bauer [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: August 9, 2012 16:54
To: Janusz Michalik
Cc: Dray, Colan; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Subject: Re: [Paraview] BUG?: Paraview 3.14.1 Linux 64-bit --> can not call 
GradientsOfUnstructuredDataSet through python script

I'm able to get the GradientOfUnstructuredDataSet filter through the GUI's 
python interpretor so I'm not sure what's causing your problem. Could you share 
the script?

I am able to cause problems if I don't have an active filter/source when 
creating the GradientOfUnstructuredDataSet filter since it complains, as it 
should, that there isn't a proper input for it.

Andy

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Janusz Michalik 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Sorry, in the e-mail I misspelled it. I do use:

GradientOfUnstructuredDataSet()

as the error indicates; it is not related to the spelling. After I sent out the 
first e-mail I tried Paraview 3.14.0 Linux 64-bit and it works, so for what I 
need this is fine. I think it is a bug that needs to be fixed in 3.14.1, if it 
hasn't already been fixed in the developers version.

________________________________
From: Dray, Colan [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: August 8, 2012 14:16
To: Janusz Michalik
Subject: RE: [Paraview] BUG?: Paraview 3.14.1 Linux 64-bit --> can not call 
GradientsOfUnstructuredDataSet through python script

GradientOfUnstructuredDataSet
GradientsOfUnstructuredDatSet()

There’s a spelling discrepancy between the two: missing “A” in data, and extra 
“S” after gradient. Could that be the issue?


-Colan

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On 
Behalf Of Janusz Michalik
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:35 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Paraview] BUG?: Paraview 3.14.1 Linux 64-bit --> can not call 
GradientsOfUnstructuredDataSet through python script

Hi all,

I switched from Paraview 3.12.0 to 3.14.1 Linux 64-bit and have the following 
error:

Traceback (most recent call last):

File "<string>", line 6, in <module>

TypeError: 'GradientOfUnstructuredDataSet' object is not callable


when I try to take the gradients of the velocity by calling: 
GradientsOfUnstructuredDatSet(). This worked in 3.12.0, did something change? 
Is there a quick fix for this? Please let me know. I would go back to the old 
version except that the numpy eig functions return 0+0i for any matrix I throw 
at it (so another bug which I assume won't be fixed since its an older version).

Best,
Janusz

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com>

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview



_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to