Hi Lucas,

In my opinion, using multipiece to handle parallel decompositions of VTK
structured grids is currently the best way to go for ParaView Catalyst.

Andy


On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Pettey . Lucas <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
> I think it must be something with MPI4PY on my Mac. I got it to compile
> and run on the Utility server here at ERDC.
>
> Now, is the example here
> https://github.com/acbauer/CatalystExampleCode/tree/master/CxxMultiPieceExamplethe
>  easiest way to incorporate extents into the Fortran code? I am
> basically trying to run the Fortran example on more than one processor and
> I was going to adapt the Fortran FXCxxAdaptor following the
> CxxMultiPieceExample.
>
> Unless there is a better way. My first attempt didn't create the expanding
> ball that the serial Fortran example does. It did produce an image, but not
> the one that I wanted.
>
> Thanks
> Lucas
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andy Bauer [[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:28 PM
> To: Pettey . Lucas
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Initialize coprocessor fails
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Every process should call coprocessorinitializewithpython(). I'm not sure
> how to solve this but first off maybe trying the Fortran 90 example at
> https://github.com/acbauer/CatalystExampleCode may help simplify the
> problem. What machine are you trying this on and what version of ParaView
> are you using?
>
> Andy
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Pettey . Lucas <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a Fortran serial test case working that uses the Catalyst
> coprocessor to generate images.
>
> I tried moving to a parallel test case, but the program crashes with the
> error:
>
> ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Attempt to redefine an existing data type in file
> runtime/orte_globals.c at line 218
>
> at the call to initialize the coprocessor:
>
> call coprocessorinitializewithpython("coproc.py",9)
>
> Does this call change in parallel, or should only one processor be calling
> it?
>
> If I comment out the line of code that calls the coprocessor
> initialization, then the code runs fine, I just get the error that the
> co-processor needs to initialize every time there is a VTK coprocessor call.
>
> Thanks for any help,
> Lucas
> ________________________________
> This electronic message transmission and any attachments that accompany it
> contain information from DRCĀ® (Dynamics Research Corporation) or its
> subsidiaries, or the intended recipient, which is privileged, proprietary,
> business confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure and is the
> exclusive property of DRC and/or the intended recipient. The information in
> this email is solely intended for the use of the individual or entity that
> is the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
> dissemination, distribution, retention, or copying of this communication,
> attachments, or substance is prohibited. If you have received this
> electronic transmission in error, please immediately reply to the author
> via email that you received the message by mistake and also promptly and
> permanently delete this message and all copies of this email and any
> attachments. We thank you for your assistance and apologize for any
> inconvenience.
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com>
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to