Hi David, I just started to try superbuild on Titan also. I don't see you set ENABLE_MPI to be true in your configure script. Could you confirm whether ENABLE_MPI needs to be set to TRUE in order for ParaView to run on Titan in parallel? Since my purpose is to link our simulation code (already built statically with CMake on Titan) to ParaView CoProcessing libraries (I am using version 3.98.1) for in-situ visualization on Titan, so in this case, do I have to set ENABLE_paraview to true and do I need to enable OSMesa for ParaView to resort to off-screen rendering for in-situ visualization?
Although I can build ParaView from source on Titan login nodes, I am not able to run it on compute nodes, so I am starting to try superbuild hoping to be able to cross build ParaView libraries to run in-situ visualization on Titan. Thanks, Hong ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of David E DeMarle [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:21 PM To: Vanmoer, Mark W Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Paraview] Building on Titan using ParaViewSuperbuild Your tools build is pointing to the compiler wrapper that you normally would use to make code for the back end. The tools build should just use plain old local gcc since we only build things at that point that run on the login node. Try these setup scripts: I source configtools.sh to set up my environment before I build the compile tools, and configcross.sh before before I cross compile ParaView. configtools.sh #use my own cmake, system one is too old setenv PATH /autofs/na4_proj/csc035/demarle/pvdev/titan/cmake-build/bin:${PATH} #switch compiler to compile code for front end module unload PrgEnv-pgi module load gcc #configure settings for to build compile tools only cmake \ -DCROSS_BUILD_STAGE:STRING=TOOLS -Dcross_target:STRING=xk7_gnu \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release \ -DBUILD_TESTING:BOOL=FALSE \ -DParaView_FROM_GIT:BOOL=OFF \ -DENABLE_paraview:BOOL=TRUE \ -DENABLE_boost:BOOL=TRUE \ -DENABLE_python:BOOL=TRUE \ -DENABLE_portfwd:BOOL=FALSE \ ../../ParaViewSuperbuild then make configcross.sh #use my own cmake, system one is too old setenv PATH /autofs/na4_proj/csc035/demarle/pvdev/titan/cmake-build/bin:${PATH} #switch compiler to compile code for back end module unload PrgEnv-pgi module unload gcc module load PrgEnv-gnu #not sure why module load wasn't sufficient, but ended up needing to force #cmake to choose the right compiler setenv CC /opt/cray/xt-asyncpe/5.17/bin/cc setenv CXX /opt/cray/xt-asyncpe/5.17/bin/CC #configure settings to cross compile python, (mesa - implied), and paraview cmake \ -DCROSS_BUILD_STAGE:STRING=CROSS -Dcross_target:STRING=xk7_gnu \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release \ -DBUILD_TESTING:BOOL=TRUE \ -DParaView_FROM_GIT:BOOL=OFF \ -DENABLE_paraview:BOOL=TRUE \ -DENABLE_python:BOOL=TRUE \ ../../ParaViewSuperbuild then make again David E DeMarle Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4909 On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Vanmoer, Mark W <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I'm trying to follow the advice on building ParaView on Titan using the ParaViewSuperbuild method from an earlier discussion in June. When I run make in the "TOOLS" directory I get the following error: [ 66%] Building CXX object Utilities/ProcessXML/CMakeFiles/kwProcessXML.dir/ProcessXML.cxx.o Linking CXX executable ../../bin/vtkkwProcessXML-pv4.0 /usr/bin/ld: attempted static link of dynamic object `../../lib/libvtkCommonCore-pv4.0.so.1' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[6]: *** [bin/vtkkwProcessXML-pv4.0] Error 1 make[5]: *** [Utilities/ProcessXML/CMakeFiles/kwProcessXML.dir/all] Error 2 make[4]: *** [CMakeFiles/pvCompileTools.dir/rule] Error 2 make[3]: *** [pvCompileTools] Error 2 CMake Error at /ccs/home/vanmoer/builds/superbuild/tools-build/pv-paraview-build.cmake:26 (message): Failed!!! make[2]: *** [paraview/src/paraview-stamp/paraview-build] Error 1 I don't see a BUILD_SHARED that I can toggle. All of the CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS* vars are empty, if those are related. Any suggestions? Thanks, Mark _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
