That means it is using the GPU to do the rendering, which is good and that's what is expected.
But I still don't understand why you get so terrible fps. Seb PS: Bring back the list in the loop ;-) On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:26 AM, David Torres <[email protected]>wrote: > > Do you see a pop-up window showing up with the 3D content in it on the > server machine? > > Yes I do see a pop-up window with the axes at the first moment. But then > it turns black and I cannot see the content in it (only in the browser). > This pop-up window is however changing its size when I change the size of > the browser window (so it is still connected in some way). > > Does this say something to you? > > Best regards, > > David Torres > > Computer Scientist > Renuda UK > > tel: +44 (0)20 3371 1709 > web: www.renuda.com > > Renuda UK is registered in England and Wales. Company number 6218863. > VAT registration number 918 6490 91. Registered office: 35 Charleville > Road, London W14 9JJ, UK. > Renuda registered trade mark. > ------------------------------ > *From:* Sebastien Jourdain [[email protected]] > *Sent:* 17 March 2014 15:07 > *To:* David Torres > > *Subject:* Re: What is the performance bottleneck in ParaViewWeb? > > You are... > > This is really strange... > > Do you see a pop-up window showing up with the 3D content in it on the > server machine? > > Seb > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:09 AM, David Torres <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> > Are you using the same paraview binary when you compare pvweb and pv? >> >> Yes I am using the same (I think) >> >> I am using */opt/paraviewopenfoam410/bin/paraview* to run ParaView >> >> and */opt/paraviewopenfoam410/bin/pvpython >> lib/paraview-4.1/site-packages/paraview/web/pv_web_visualizer.py* *--content >> /opt/**paraviewopenfoam410/share/paraview-4.1/www --data-dir >> /home/myuser/VTKData/ --port 8080...* to run ParaViewWeb. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> David Torres >> >> Computer Scientist >> Renuda UK >> >> tel: +44 (0)20 3371 1709 >> web: www.renuda.com >> >> Renuda UK is registered in England and Wales. Company number 6218863. >> VAT registration number 918 6490 91. Registered office: 35 Charleville >> Road, London W14 9JJ, UK. >> Renuda registered trade mark. >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Sebastien Jourdain [[email protected]] >> *Sent:* 17 March 2014 14:03 >> >> *To:* David Torres >> *Cc:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: What is the performance bottleneck in ParaViewWeb? >> >> Are you using the same paraview binary when you compare pvweb and pv? >> >> On Mar 17, 2014, at 5:24, David Torres <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Seb, >> >> Thank you for the information :) >> >> There is not network involved. I am using the same machine as client and >> server (I access like this: http://localhost:8080/apps/Visualizer/) >> >> I changed the quality of the images and there is no difference in the >> performance (you were right). So, then, what is the bottleneck? Server and >> client is the same machine and I can move fluently (25-30fps) the models I >> am opening with ParaViewWeb if I open them just with ParaView. >> >> By the way, I have the bad performance in ParaViewWeb (2-5 fps) even if I >> don't load anything and I only move the axes. Any idea where the bottleneck >> might be? Anything I can do to find it out? >> >> Many thanks in advance for your help. >> >> Best regards, >> >> David Torres >> >> Computer Scientist >> Renuda UK >> >> tel: +44 (0)20 3371 1709 >> web: www.renuda.com >> >> Renuda UK is registered in England and Wales. Company number 6218863. >> VAT registration number 918 6490 91. Registered office: 35 Charleville >> Road, London W14 9JJ, UK. >> Renuda registered trade mark. >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Sebastien Jourdain [[email protected]] >> *Sent:* 14 March 2014 20:22 >> *To:* David Torres >> *Cc:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Where is the properties file for ParaViewWeb? >> >> Are you trying directly on the machine that act as the server, or >> using a remote client? On what network type? >> Because usually when I get 2-5 fps, it's because the server is in US and >> I'm on a basic DSL line in France... >> >> I'm not sure that lowering the image quality will change that much. In >> fact, it already do it by default. >> >> I'm still thinking the issue is somewhere else. >> >> Anyway to change the quality, you will need to edit the >> www/apps/Visualizer/index.html >> >> [...] >> // Build application >> function init() { >> // - viewport >> $(".viewport-container").empty(); >> viewport = vtkWeb.createViewport({ >> session: session, >> interactiveQuality: 30, >> stillQuality: 100 >> }); >> [...] >> >> Here is the full documentation about that: >> http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/Doc/Nightly/www/js-doc/index.html#!/api/vtkWeb.Viewport >> >> Seb >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:12 PM, David Torres >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Seb, >>> >>> I tested in Chrome 26.0.1410.63 and in Firefox 20.0 (Mozilla Firefox >>> for Ubuntu canonical - 1.0) >>> I got similar results. I also noticed that the selector which changes >>> from "Images" to "WebGL" or "VGL - WebGl" is not doing anything (or at >>> least I cannot see any difference). In any case I am interested in "Images" >>> i.e. rendering in the server. But I would need to low the quality of the >>> images in order to boost the performance. >>> >>> Could you point any instructions that allow me to change the images >>> resolution when the model is being moved? >>> >>> Many many thanks :) >>> >>> PS: Only as an example, in order to clarify: I have tried a mesh with >>> 100 cells and a mesh with 10 million cells. I am getting exactly the same >>> performance for both of them (2-5 fps). >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> David Torres >>> >>> Computer Scientist >>> Renuda UK >>> >>> tel: +44 (0)20 3371 1709 >>> web: www.renuda.com >>> >>> Renuda UK is registered in England and Wales. Company number 6218863. >>> VAT registration number 918 6490 91. Registered office: 35 Charleville >>> Road, London W14 9JJ, UK. >>> Renuda registered trade mark. >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Sebastien Jourdain [[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* 14 March 2014 16:38 >>> >>> *To:* David Torres >>> *Cc:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Where is the properties file for ParaViewWeb? >>> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> you are right, your browser will just display the images that are sent >>> by ParaViewWeb. >>> >>> BTW, which browser+version are you using? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Seb >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:10 AM, David Torres >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you Sabastien, >>>> >>>> The thing is that in my machine, I have a good performance with >>>> ParaView. The bad performance is with ParaViewWeb. I am assuming that this >>>> is because the quality of the images that is sending is too high (I think >>>> the browser is not rendering, only receiving images from the server, am I >>>> right?). >>>> >>>> For the record, I installed ParaView using >>>> `sudo apt-get install paraviewopenfoam410` >>>> as `sudo apt-get install paraview` was installing the version 3.X and >>>> here [1] says that 4.1 or newer is required in order to have ParaViewWeb. >>>> >>>> Thank you for your help. >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/Doc/Nightly/www/js-doc/index.html#!/guide/quick_start >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> David Torres >>>> >>>> Computer Scientist >>>> Renuda UK >>>> >>>> tel: +44 (0)20 3371 1709 >>>> web: www.renuda.com >>>> >>>> Renuda UK is registered in England and Wales. Company number 6218863. >>>> VAT registration number 918 6490 91. Registered office: 35 Charleville >>>> Road, London W14 9JJ, UK. >>>> Renuda registered trade mark. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* Sebastien Jourdain [[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* 14 March 2014 04:02 >>>> *To:* David Torres >>>> *Cc:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Where is the properties file for ParaViewWeb? >>>> >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> The file pw-config.properties is used with the Java version of the >>>> launcher. Now with the latest release, we also provide a Python one. >>>> => >>>> http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/Doc/Nightly/www/js-doc/index.html#!/guide/py_launcher >>>> >>>> Moreover, those configuration files are used to configure a front-end >>>> web server that will trigger pvpython command lines. For testing out >>>> ParaViewWeb, those front-end are optional. Although, it should be pretty >>>> easy to setup the python one by creating a config file that match your >>>> local setting. >>>> For real deployment read the EC2 documentation that explain how to >>>> setup apache to deal with the ws forwarding. >>>> >>>> Regarding the performances, on a local machine, you should be around >>>> 30 fps. So I suspect, you don't have a proper driver for your graphic card. >>>> If you have an Nvidia graphic card, try to install their driver. >>>> >>>> Thanks for letting me know that the script does not work for you, >>>> I'll fix it once I have a chance. >>>> >>>> Seb >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:01 AM, David Torres <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> in Linux using apt-get, and started the >>>>> >>>>> I am starting with ParaViewWeb. I installed Paraview 4.1.0. in Linux >>>>> using apt-get, and started the ParaViewWeb server using the guide in [ >>>>> 1]. >>>>> >>>>> I found is working very slow, even in local (2-5fps I think). And I >>>>> read that I could play with images quality but I don't know where can I >>>>> change them. Here [2] says there is a file called * >>>>> pw-config.properties *which I couldn't find (I used `find / -name >>>>> pw-config.properties`). I guess it belongs to a previous ParaView version. >>>>> >>>>> Then, my question is: where is the properties file in 4.1.0 and what >>>>> is its name? Will I be able to change the quality of the images there? >>>>> >>>>> By the way, I tried the script provided in 'Simple Install' section in >>>>> [1]. It has a mistake in the line 15. >>>>> It is: >>>>> `data = "ParaViewData-v4.1.zip"` >>>>> and it should be >>>>> `data = "ParaViewData-v4.1.0.zip"` >>>>> >>>>> However, after correcting that, is still failing in line 160 at some >>>>> point (at least in Linux) and I couldn't find the error. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you in advance for your help. >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/Doc/Nightly/www/js-doc/index.html#!/guide/quick_start >>>>> [2] http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaViewWeb_Server_setting >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> David Torres >>>>> >>>>> Computer Scientist >>>>> Renuda UK >>>>> >>>>> tel: +44 (0)20 3371 1709 >>>>> web: www.renuda.com >>>>> >>>>> Renuda UK is registered in England and Wales. Company number >>>>> 6218863. >>>>> VAT registration number 918 6490 91. Registered office: 35 Charleville >>>>> Road, London W14 9JJ, UK. >>>>> Renuda registered trade mark. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>>>> >>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>>>> >>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>>>> >>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
