Hmm, well I have no idea if we're hitting the same bug or not but it seems like too much of a coincidence that this is happening for both of us at 14 procs but not 13. I created a mantis issue at http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=14996. Feel free to add to it if you can share your Ensight file.
Regards, Andy On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Stephens, Michael M ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS < [email protected]> wrote: > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: FOUO > > in all cases for the ensight data we are working with, there is no READ > error. > > there is no error reported at all either for reading or extract block > operations. > > > > the extract block silently fails to pass the variable data for larger core > counts on the data we are working on. geometry seems okay. > > > > btw, I am not very fluent in my understanding of the ensight formats (case > files or otherwise) > > > > -m > > > > *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, September 15, 2014 3:23 PM > *To:* Stephens, Michael M ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] slightly puzzled by paraview extract block > behavior (UNCLASSIFIED) > > > > Hey Mike, > > I'm getting something funky when reading an Ensight file with 14 processes > as well that I don't see with 2 or 13 processes (I didn't bother trying > with other amounts). The error I get is: > ERROR: In > /home/acbauer/CODE/ParaView/ParaView-v4.1.0/VTK/Common/DataModel/vtkDataSet.cxx, > line 414 > vtkStructuredGrid (0xa70560): Point array DENS with 1 components, only has > -325 tuples but there are 0 points > > This is just for loading in the file though and not even using the extract > block filter. Are you getting a similar error? > > I'm getting the error with the naca.bin.case at > http://www.paraview.org/gitweb?p=ParaViewData.git;a=tree;f=Data/EnSight;h=fc6cbe6fc7851e2f3bae520f4cf4b933ab963c93;hb=HEAD. > > > Best, > > Andy > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Stephens, Michael M ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: FOUO > > had someone ask me for help with a problem they were having with paraview > v4.1.0 in server/client mode. > > > > steps are: i) read in an ensight case file, ii) use Extract Block filter > to yank out a particular block, iii) color extracted block with various > variables. > > simple enough. > > > > let me say up front that the data is pretty small (order of 100k points, > 450k cells). > > we ran this using a varying number of procs in a single node. > > > > when the number of procs got to be 14 or greater (16 cores in the server > nodes) the extract block step lost the data variables. > > the geometry was correct still but none of the data variables survived the > operation. > > > > I’ll stipulate that it makes little sense to use more than one proc for > data this small. > > > > but why does the extract block not still work? > > > > slightly puzzled. > > > > -m > > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: FOUO > > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: FOUO >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
