Hi,
A post by Robert Atwood in June mentioned a problem with client server volume 
visualisation in PV4.1, and I have also seen problems in this case both on 
Linux and Windows systems.

Fixes (0014794 and 0014792) have been added to 4.2RC1 which allow correct 
rendering of the wavelet test case. I tried this on a Windows 7 system and 
works ok for 4.2RC1, but not for 4.1.

However I think that the remote/local render problem for volume visualisation 
is really very confusing and needs to be improved. After spending more time 
then I should with it, I conclude that (again on windows 7 64 bit):

(1)    Volume rendering only works if done on the remote server, not the local 
on (as acknowledged in a tracker ticket, though I have not seen it documented 
elsewhere).

(2)    For 4.1 to do this correctly for just a volume image this seems to need 
settings of "remote render threshold" ticked and "0 Mbytes" selected. It will 
work for cases when >0 Mbytes is selected, if there is also another object 
displayed (e.g. an isosurface). This led me to think an additional surface was 
always needed to see the volume, which is not the case.

(3)    For 4.2RC1 the interface to settings has changed and there is no longer 
a tick box. Instead the slider for remote local render size has a much greater 
range. This should be set to zero to force remote render for volume views. It 
also works for non-zero values less than the size of the volume data, e.g. 
4Mbytes for a 256^3 volume. This setting did not seem work for 4.1 to force a 
remote rendering of just volume data.

I think it would be useful if at least the tool tips in the settings panel 
suggested how to make client server volume rendering work. It would also be 
useful if a warning message were displayed when trying (and failing) to do a 
local volume render in client server mode.

Another problem that has been observed is that the "smart" option for volume 
rendering is not necessarily that smart when the server nodes have no GPUs and 
the client does. This was on a Linux 64 bit system with 4.1.

Thanks,
Ron fowler








-- 
Scanned by iCritical.

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to