Sorry Cory, you are right. The cell number is the same.
Regards Philipp Am 19.09.2014 um 17:46 schrieb Cory Quammen: > Philipp, > > I can confirm what you see with a pre 4.2 version of ParaView. > However, the number of produced cells is the same. > > I will try to track down why this changed. > > Thanks, > Cory > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Philipp E <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Cory >> >> I managed to compress the data set to a fair size and attached it to >> this mail. The data set is pressure, contour value is 0.55. >> >> By looking again at the data (contour -> information), I just found that >> the old version (3.14.1) uses 148432 cells , while the the new one >> employs 75232 cells. Hope that helps. >> >> Kind regards >> Philipp >> >> Errata: I meant 4.2.0RC1 in the previous mails. >> >> On 09/19/2014 04:59 PM, Cory Quammen wrote: >>> Phillipp, >>> >>> Do you have a data set similar to the one you've shown that you can share? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Cory >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Philipp E <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Cory, >>>> >>>> thank you for your fast feedback. >>>> >>>> a) Compute normal is checked. (Without normals, the contour is >>>> completely stepped) >>>> b) Contour values are the same. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Philipp >>>> >>>> On 09/19/2014 04:40 PM, Cory Quammen wrote: >>>>> Philipp, >>>>> >>>>> In the contour filter, is the option "Compute Normals" checked in 4.0 RC1? >>>>> >>>>> Also, are the contour values the same between the two versions? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Cory >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Philipp E <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> after extensive search I was desperate enough to post on this list: >>>>>> >>>>>> It appears that the surface smoothing algorithm of the contour filter >>>>>> does not work as "aggressive" as in older version (3.14.1 was the last >>>>>> one we found to do so). As an example I prepared this two screenshots, >>>>>> VTK data are scalars on a structured grid (200x100x100), legacy format. >>>>>> (An additional call of the "smooth" filter does not help.) >>>>>> >>>>>> 3.14.1 >>>>>> http://s7.directupload.net/images/140919/euadfvko.png >>>>>> 4.0.RC1 >>>>>> http://s14.directupload.net/images/140919/84y689mi.png >>>>>> >>>>>> Both versions are running with the shipped settings. Since the effect >>>>>> could be reproduced on several workstations, we are wondering whether >>>>>> there has been an (undocumented?) change in the filter mechanism or some >>>>>> option we/setting/data problem we are not aware of. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards and thanks in advance >>>>>> Philipp Engels. >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>>>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>>>>> >>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>>>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
