Hi, Paul,

Thanks for the pointers.

joe

On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Paul Edwards 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Joe,

I've seen this before and there is a bug report in mantis here:

http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=13382

There has also been a patch posted to the vtk-developers list a while back 
although I haven't tested it:

http://markmail.org/message/zg3damrg27p5sgue

Regards,
Paul

On 10 October 2014 00:32, Insley, Joseph A. 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,

I have a serial vtu dataset provided by one of my users.  Their current code 
can produce this in either ascii or inline binary.  I am currently trying to 
convert this to appended binary (ultimately to pvtu with appended binary).
I'm having trouble, which I now believe may stem from the data containing 
VTK_POLYHEDRON.

I have a simple python script that I use with pvbatch to do this conversion, 
but I see the same results when I load the original data set with ParaView 
(4.1.0, in client/server mode), and use the Save Data option and save as vtu.
I get the same results for each input format (ascii or inline binary), and 
output format (ascii, binary, appended).

The first few lines of the original vtu file look like this:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
  <VTKFile type="UnstructuredGrid" version="0.1" byte_order="BigEndian">
  <UnstructuredGrid>
    <Piece NumberOfPoints="1699427" NumberOfCells="384126">

The first few lines of the converted file look like this:

offset="177748206"ructuredGrid" version="0.1" byte_order="LittleEndian">
  <UnstructuredGrid>
    <Piece NumberOfPoints="1699427"              NumberOfCells="384126"         
     >


Something is clearly getting jumbled at the beginning of the converted file.  
If I manually edit the header of the file to read  <VTKFile 
type="UnstructuredGrid", there are still problems with the file.  In that case 
the info tab in ParaView reports the correct number of points and cells, but no 
geometry is drawn.   I have successfully converted other vtu files using this 
same method.  The primary difference that I've been able to identify is that 
the files that are not converting happily contain VTK_POLYHEDRON elements.

Has anyone else seen similar behavior?

Thanks,
joe

===================================================
joseph a. insley                                                          
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
argonne leadership computing facility                       (630) 
252-5649<tel:%28630%29%20252-5649>
argonne national laboratory




_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com/>

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview



_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to