I was trying to directly update the source codes then compile my own. That 
didn't work. I was able to build ParaView 4.2.0 against my installed HDF5 
(1.8.13) and have it create the package in the /Applications BUT not all the 
libraries got "fixed up". The Qt libraries and my HDF5 libraries did not get 
their "install_name" fixed. 

Do I need to build from the "SuperBuild" to actually create a new package I can 
give to my employees?

Thanks
Mike Jackson

On Nov 5, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> Are you talking about updating the HDF5 in ParaView source itself or
> in the binaries we distribute?
> 
> Utkarsh
> 
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Michael Jackson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks for getting the bug report in. I was poking around the ParaView 
>> source and it does not look straight forward at all to substitute in a 
>> prebuilt HDF5 library (system hdf5). I can not even find the CMake Variables 
>> that might let me do this. I tried so simply substitute the latest stable 
>> HDF5 into the source tree but as I figured CMake threw lots of errors. If 
>> you give me a gentle nudge I might be able to help a bit. We are really 
>> being held back by this with our current data sets.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Mike Jackson
>> 
>> On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sounds good. I'll work on updating the HDF5 version for next release.
>>> 
>>> http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=15106
>>> 
>>> Utkarsh
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Michael Jackson
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> The current version of ParaView (4.2.1) uses a fairly old version of HDF5 
>>>> (API version 1.8.9). This version has a nasty bug on OS X that will not 
>>>> allow HDF5 to read a data set that is larger than 4GB (2^32). This is due 
>>>> to a bug in the configuration process that incorrectly identifies a 
>>>> "size_t" as being unsigned 32 bit integer on Darwin instead of a 64 bit 
>>>> unsigned integer. What is the possibility of getting a newer HDF5 included 
>>>> in ParaView for the next release?
>>>> 
>>>> BTW. a new release of HDF5 is coming in a few weeks. This would make a 
>>>> great opportunity to get this fixed with the latest version of HDF5.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Mike Jackson
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>> 
>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>> 
>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
>>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>> 
>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>> 

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to