On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:45:47 +0100, Christoph Grüninger wrote:
> let me rephrase my question:
> Is it save to add /usr/share/cmake/hdf5/ within the ParaView package? Or
> would it affect a HDF5 package?
It would likely conflict with a native HDF5 package. Is there a reason
the system HDF5 isn't used?
> I am unsure, whether /usr/share/paraview/hdf5.setting wouldn't be safer.
> But I am alien to HDF5 and might be wrong.
Directory ownership in RPM isn't really straightforward or obvious all
the time :( . Fedora's guidelines are here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
Here, I'd say the package you're making should own the directory and
hdf5.settings.
--Ben
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
