On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 09:40:16 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Doesn't seem so. Looks like ParaView will need changes for 2.6.0.
> Searching around, seems like the changes necessary for it are probably
> minor[1].
An attempt at this:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/52
This won't verify it works with 2.6.0 since we don't have any buildbot
machines with 2.6.0, so if you could test that this branch works for
you, that'd be great. Thanks,
--Ben
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
