Hi,
I did try to determine the differences between the ParaView built in reader and 
the one supplied by OpenFOAM, but could not find any documentation on this. I 
do know that the ParaView built in one has been improved in recent releases and 
seems to do all that I require of it. I tend to use RHEL6 systems and I believe 
that the OpenFOAM only support an older version of ParaView on these systems, 
so I rarely use paraFOAM.
I tend to use ParaView 4.4 but have not done any timings with it yet. There is 
also a version of 4.4 with the OpenGL 2 backend that may be faster.
Ron



From: Leonard Cassady [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 02 October 2015 13:27
To: Fowler, Ronald (STFC,RAL,SC)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Correctly Parallel Processing of OpenFoam results using 
pvserver

Hi,

  I didn't realize that there are 2 different extensions for OpenFOAM projects. 
 I also didn't realize that Paraview had a native OpenFoam reader.  What 
functionality (normally supplied by OpenFOAM paraFoam ) is lost when using 
Paraview without starting with paraFoam?  I'm asking because I've heard that 
ParaView 4.4 is extremely fast and would like to test it out with OpenFoam 
files but not paraFoam.

Thanks

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:44 PM, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
It is simple to create a .foam file; just do "touch xxx.foam" in the working 
directory. Then point ParaView at that file and it will use the builtin 
openFoam reader which should offer the reconstructed/decomposed option. The 
empty file just tells ParaView which reader to use based on the extension.
Ron


________________________________
From: ParaView 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf 
of Leonard Cassady 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: 30 September 2015 21:50
To: David E DeMarle
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Correctly Parallel Processing of OpenFoam results using 
pvserver

David,

   I do not have a chooser for "case type".  I found a web page that shows the 
"case type" chooser.  They were opening a .foam file.  I have .OpenFOAM case.

   Should I consider converting the foam to VTK?



On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:59 PM, David E DeMarle 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
 wrote:
Looping the list back in to the thread.

Look on the properties panel when you open the file and before you hit "Apply" 
look for a chooser for "Case Type". The default is "Reconstructed Case" so 
change it to "Decomposed Case".


David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909<tel:518-881-4909><tel:518-881-4909<tel:518-881-4909>>

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Leonard Cassady 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
 wrote:
Dave,

I don't know how to switch to decomposed type.

Thanks,


On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:47 PM, David E DeMarle 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
 wrote:
As I recall, reconstructed means that the root node does all the work. Switch 
to decomposed type in the reader and let us know how it works then.

thanks



David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909<tel:518-881-4909><tel:518-881-4909<tel:518-881-4909>>

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Leonard Cassady 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
 wrote:
I'm attempting to use pvserver to accelerate the post-processing of my openfoam 
solution. I have a 48 core machine. I have correctly installed and compiled a 
parallel copy of paraview 4.1.0 with OpenFOAM 2.4.x. If I open a simple .obj 
file I can see that different parts of the surface are rendered using different 
processors. I can also see that the memory is shared among the parallel 
processes.

When I open a reconstructed openFOAM solution with 20 million cells with 
paraview connected to 40 process pvserver, the image seems to be rendered (or 
processed) with only 1 processor. Is there a step that I'm missing to 
parallelize the reconstructed Openfoam data files for rendering?

--
Leonard Cassady PhD
Senior Development Engineer
Intuitive Machines
Cell: 281-755-2553<tel:281-755-2553><tel:281-755-2553<tel:281-755-2553>>

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com<http://www.kitware.com><http://www.kitware.com>

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview





--
Leonard Cassady PhD
Senior Development Engineer
Intuitive Machines
Cell: 281-755-2553<tel:281-755-2553><tel:281-755-2553<tel:281-755-2553>>




--
Leonard Cassady PhD
Senior Development Engineer
Intuitive Machines
Cell: 281-755-2553<tel:281-755-2553>



--
Leonard Cassady PhD
Senior Development Engineer
Intuitive Machines
Cell: 281-755-2553
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to