Not sure what you mean by new_benchmark.py. You should run benchmark/manyspheres.py.
It takes resolution and numspheres arguments. numspheres is the total number of objects in the scene and each processors makes a diffent set of them. Resolution is the phi&theta resolution of each that controls the number of polygons each sphere has. David E DeMarle Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4909 On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) <[email protected]> wrote: > Dave – I’m running the new_benchmark.py script from the command line > > pvpython new_benchmark.py > > > Is there a way to jack up the number of polygons that the script generates? > > ________________________________ > Rick Angelini > USArmy Research Laboratory > CISD/HPC Architectures Team > Phone: 410-278-6266 > > From: David E DeMarle <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, March 21, 2016 at 1:08 PM > To: Rick Angelini <[email protected]> > Cc: ParaView <[email protected]> > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Measure graphics performance? > > All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the > identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained > within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web > browser. > > ------------------------------ > > > At the VTK single node level, enable Module_vtkUtilitiesBenchmarks module > in cmake, compile and run bin/TimingTests > > At the ParaView multiple node level, Chuck Atkins is nearly done with > revamping the old benchmark.py and adding to it a simple canonical test > script that uses the programmable filter to make arbitrarily large meshes > to test parallel rendering with. That can be found at: Caution- > https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 < Caution- > https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/692 > > > > > > David E DeMarle > Kitware, Inc. > R&D Engineer > 21 Corporate Drive > Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 > Phone: 518-881-4909 > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY > RDECOM ARL (US) <[email protected] < Caution- > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > >> I need to do some quick performance tests to compare the results between >> two graphics cards using “real world” applications. Do you guys have a >> benchmark handy to measure interactive graphics performance??????? >> ________________________________ >> Rick Angelini >> USArmy Research Laboratory >> CISD/HPC Architectures Team >> Phone: 410-278-6266 < tel:410-278-6266 > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Powered by Caution-www.kitware.com < Caution-http://www.kitware.com > >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at Caution- >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html < Caution- >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: Caution- >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView < Caution- >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > >> >> Search the list archives at: Caution- >> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView < Caution- >> http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview < Caution- >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
