Hi,
Actually, i am using same ParaView installation (under Mac OS) to create
the Catalyst script and compiling the model code. So, OpenGL backend
must be consistent. In any case, i'll try your suggestion and let you
know about it.
Regards,
--ufuk
On 04/05/16 22:37, Andy Bauer wrote:
Hi,
Are you generating the Catalyst script with PV built with the OpenGL2
backend and then linking with a version of Catalyst built with the
OpenGL1 backend? I'd guess that this is the problem.
To isolate the issue further, you can do a Python trace in the GUI to
see if you get the same issue when you run pvpython with that script.
Best,
Andy
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Cory,
Do you think that it is a bug in Catalyst side. In this case, i am
running the code as follows
export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/progs/paraview-5.0.0/lib:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
export
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/progs/paraview-5.0.0/lib:${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH}
mpirun -np 12 ./main.x
Thanks for your help,
--ufuk
On 29/04/16 16:58, Cory Quammen wrote:
It indeed looks like the scalar opacity function is not being
set up
properly when using Catalyst. Looking at your script, it looks
like it
should be, though.
Could you describe how you are running this with Catalyst?
Thanks,
Cory
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
I had a problem in Catalyst when i run a visualization
pipeline with volume
rendering. The attached figures shows the problem and
belong to same
visualization with and without Catalyst. In my case, the
co-processing
Python script (dvr.py) is generated from multi-block
dataset and the
Catalyst code uses MPI code to define multi-block dataset
also. So, it is
consistent in both side. The visualization pipeline
includes Transform and
MergeBlocks filters to create the final image and mapper
is set as Bunyk Ray
Cast. It seems that there is a problem in the color
transfer function but i
am not sure. I also test with different mapper such as
projected-tetra but
the result is same. I just wonder that did you see any
similar problem
before.
Regards,
Istanbul Technical University
Informatics Institute
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Search the list archives at:
http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
