3.3
David E DeMarle Kitware, Inc. R&D Engineer 21 Corporate Drive Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 Phone: 518-881-4909 On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Albina, Frank < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi David! > > > > Thanks for the swift feedback. As I have been compiling ParaView from > source for at least the last 6 years, it never came to my mind trying out > the super-build. £ > > > > I’ll try it out and report if I find myself stuck. > > > > By the way, which CMake version do you recommend for building ParaView > v5.1.2 from the git repository? > > > > Best regards, > > > Frank. > > > > *From:* David E DeMarle [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Montag, 26. September 2016 15:37 > *To:* Albina, Frank > *Cc:* [email protected]; Del Citto, Francesco > *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Building ParaView v5.1.2 on Linux from source > with support for GPU and SWR. > > > > I recommend the ParaView superbuild. All of the incantations that we use > to setup and build paraview, mesa and the rest of our dependencies are > written down and maintained there. > > https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild > > We've used it for our Desktop binaries for years, and more and more often > we use it for our HPC installs as well. > > > David E DeMarle > Kitware, Inc. > R&D Engineer > 21 Corporate Drive > Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662 > Phone: 518-881-4909 > > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Albina, Frank <frank.albina@sauber- > motorsport.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > after having downloaded last week the latest ParaView release (v5.1.2) for > Linux, I have found out that the binary version has the following folder > structure in lib/paraview-5.1: > > *mesa-llvm* > > |-- *libGL.so* -> libGL.so.1 > > |-- *libGL.so.1 *-> libGL.so.1.5 > > |-- libGL.so.1.5 > > |-- *libOSMesa.so* -> libOSMesa.so.8 > > |-- *libOSMesa.so.8* -> libOSMesa.so.8.0.0 > > `-- libOSMesa.so.8.0.0 > > *mesa-swr-avx* > > |-- *libGL.so* -> libGL.so.1 > > |-- *libGL.so.1* -> libGL.so.1.5 > > |-- libGL.so.1.5 > > |-- *libOSMesa.so* -> libOSMesa.so.8 > > |-- *libOSMesa.so.8* -> libOSMesa.so.8.0.0 > > `-- libOSMesa.so.8.0.0 > > *mesa-swr-avx2* > > |-- *libGL.so* -> libGL.so.1 > > |-- *libGL.so.1 *-> libGL.so.1.5 > > |-- libGL.so.1.5 > > |-- *libOSMesa.so* -> libOSMesa.so.8 > > |-- *libOSMesa.so.8* -> libOSMesa.so.8.0.0 > > `-- libOSMesa.so.8.0.0 > > Which is an elegant way of providing a binary package for GPU and non-GPU > architectures at the same time. > > Hence my question: How do I build ParaView v5.1.2 from source to have the > same folder structure so that I have one version for GPU and software > rendering? I understand that swr-avx(2) should be also available from Mesa > v12.x. Is there anything I’d need to consider / take care of before > building the different OSMesa libraries with LLVM / OpenSWR? > > *Frank Albina* > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/ > opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
