> > which are not copied into the archive when packing the binaries using: >> “ctest -V -R cpack-paraviewsdk-TGZ” >> > > This should have been fixed a while ago. I'll try to reproduce it and > make sure the packaging is correct. >
I see the same problem. I have a fix for the packaging and will get it up shortly. It probably won't make it for the RC tonight but it will be fixed before the release. 4. Compared to the ParaView v5.1.2 binary for Linux, the compiled >> version with mesa v12.0.3 is substantially slower than with the OpenSWR >> version shipped with the binary. >> > That certainly should not be the case. > The good news is that I was just able to reproduce the problem. Even better I could isolate it to the mesa build from the superbuild. Swapping out the mesa libs in the release binary on the web site, on a single 14-Core Haswell CPU I see a difference of 25MiPolys / sec with the superbuild libraries vs 118MiPolys / sec with the website binaries. That's roughly a 4.5x performance difference, i.e. not good. I don't know yet if it's a mesa problem or how we build it. I'll dig deeper and let you know. Thanks for the bug! - Chuck
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
