CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED thank you Utkarsh. that's the confirmation that we are looking. We will test the MPI.
thanks -simon -----Original Message----- From: ParaView [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Utkarsh Ayachit Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 12:12 PM To: Patrick Begou <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Using 64 or more cores on a single node when running client/server All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser. ---- > It should be related to your mpi environment: may be oversubscribing > (more than one mpi process by core) is not the default behavior. I am tempted to second that. There's nothing in ParaView that checks how many cores your node has, as a result if there's a cap, it's coming from the MPI implementation itself. _______________________________________________ Powered by Caution-www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at Caution-http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: Caution-http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: Caution-http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
