> This is not happening for me because all my file are simple legacy .VTK > files. Right? > XML formatted files have this capacity even though they are not .P + (VTS, > VTI, VTR)
For structured datasets, yes. Note, there's still a tradeoff. With the p* versions where you're presplitting the files, all ranks need not open the same files and as a result will encounter less contention of parallel file systems, than if you use a the non-p versions which save everything in a single file. Whether the work of splitting is worth it depends on how the data was generated in the first place and then how many ranks/nodes you're planning to run this on. So I'd recommend doing some testing on your target platform and then adopt one or the other approach. > 1. How to transform my simple legacy VTK files in XML file format? Only > rewriting them from the begginning? You can simply load it in ParaView or VTK and save it out as one the XML files. > 2. Any thoughts on XML written files versus .PVTK generated by ParaView when > saving data? I am not sure what you mean. Can you elaborate? If you're referring to tradeoff between .p* and non-p versions of the XML files then see the note earlier. Utkarsh _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
