Are there places on the cylinder you are calling atan2 with the same inputs, returning the same data, lots of times? Alternatively, could you calculate this in the simulation, and just add it to the simulation output? I am speculating that a C++ call to atan2 may be faster than numpy?
Alan From: ParaView [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Conklin Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 1:39 PM To: Paraview ([email protected]) <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Calculating cylindrical coordinates All, If I wanted to run atan2(X,Y) on millions and millions of nodes to calculate cylindrical coordinates, but found that numpy.atan2 in a Programmable Filter was taking 45 minutes to run, what should I do to make it much faster? Thanks for any hints Dennis
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
