Thanks for your reply. I tried v5.4.0 first and then v5.5.2 again. However, the same problem occurred in both versions.
Both codes are the distribution version of the home page instead of superbuild. For the compile option, only PARAVIEW_USE_MPI, PARAVIEW_USE_VTKM, VTKm_ENABLE_CUDA, and VTKm_ENABLE_MPI are activated without touching anything else. Sumin 2018년 7월 6일 (금) 오후 9:46, Robert Maynard <[email protected]>님이 작성: > Hi Sumin, > > What exact version of ParaView are you building? I have been unable to > reproduce this issue with git master. > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:41 AM Robert Maynard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The "caught ErrorBadDevice: Device with id 2 is either not in the list >> or is invalid." is thrown from VTK-m when somebody has asked to >> execute on the CUDA device adapter ( with id == 2 ) and components of >> VTK-m have been built without CUDA enabled. The device id has nothing >> to do with which specific GPU VTK-m will use. >> >> As for where this mismatch in compiling with CUDA support is >> occurring, somebody from the VTK-m team will look into it. >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:12 AM Sumin Hong <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Dears users, >> > >> > >> > I would like to use the CUDA accelerated vtkm filter in ParaView. >> However, according to the release notes, binary versions do not seem to >> support CUDA acceleration properly. ( >> https://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView_Release_Notes). >> > >> > >> > So I compiled ParaView-v5.5.2 code on Ubuntu with VTKm_ENABLE_CUDA >> option. There was no problem in the build, but when I actually execute >> vtkm filter (contour filter) on paraview, I got this error message "caught >> ErrorBadDevice: Device with id 2 is either not in the list or is invalid." >> > >> > >> > This seems like the vtkm filter does not set up the proper GPU device. >> > The used system has installed only one GPU device (TITAN X Pascal) >> with CUDA 8.0. >> > >> > So I think the device ID should be 0. >> > Also, there is no problem when using a default contour filter without >> vtkm. >> > >> > >> > >> > Any help on how to solve this will be appreciated. >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Sumin. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Powered by www.kitware.com >> > >> > ParaView discussion is moving! Please visit >> https://discourse.paraview.org/ for future posts. >> > >> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >> > >> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >> > >> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >> > >> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> > https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >> >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com ParaView discussion is moving! Please visit https://discourse.paraview.org/ for future posts. Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
