It won't. The reason I haven't addressed it yet is that I'm not done doing the PS compiler rewrite.
Vladimir 2010/4/15 Daniel Gackle <[email protected]>: > Vladimir, > I don't think we heard back about this bug. I've got an ugly workaround for > it in my code, which it would be nice to get out of there. Do you think it > will be hard to fix? > Daniel > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Gackle <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Just ran across this one: >> (ps (let ((abc (@ x :abc))) >> (funcall abc))) >> => >> "var abc901 = x.abc; >> abc();" >> Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > > _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
