< Will they still merge ok? > I believe that when you format patches this way, git will apply them as long as the surrounding context matches what is in the patch. (If I'm wrong about this, somebody please correct me!)
Daniel On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:58 AM, szergling <[email protected]>wrote: > I have also encountered this problem. Enclosed is a patch, > with an additional fix to a similar issues inside arefs/arrays. > > I hope the patches are acceptable (don't know git well > enough). I would prefer for them to not depend on my > other patches from a few days ago. Will they still merge > ok? > > Yong. > > > On 5/4/10, Daniel Gackle <[email protected]> wrote: > > Another syntax error in the new PS. This form: > > > > (let ((blah (let ((x (foo))) > > (if (null x) y z))))) > > > > ... compiles to... > > > > var blah = x = foo(), x == null ? y : z; > > > > ... which is incorrect. Previously, PS produced this, which is correct: > > > > var blah = (x = foo(), x == null ? y : z); > > > > Daniel > > > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > >
_______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
