I just read the code now (yeah, it takes me a couple of months to do things), and WOW. I didn't know the CL condition system could be implemented so simply out of weaker primitives, and I didn't realize that the CL condition system is actually as simple as it is! All the CLHS and tutorial descriptions make it sound a lot more complicated.
Red, I like your implementation. And just to state the apparent: dynamic scoping FTW. Vladimir 2010/8/18 Red Daly <[email protected]>: > I have added a Common Lisp-like condition system to the Parenscript > Object System (PSOS). Parenscript now has HANDLER-BIND, HANDLER-CASE, > RESTART-CASE, RESTART-BIND, INVOKE-RESTART, and SIGNAL. > > The patch that adds this is here: > http://github.com/gonzojive/paren-psos/commit/6578ad223515dc2c1ddf49346f4baf7c3bee37c4 > and totals about 200 lines, plus 200 lines of test cases. It could > probably work without a type system at all, but it will require some > runtime code no matter what. > > The whole PSOS system is backed by a test suite that uses > CL-Spidermonkey. Take a look at PSOS here: > http://github.com/gonzojive/paren-psos for more details. > > Enjoy! > > Red > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
