Hi
Actually the above code is correct.
You can also use:
- either
(let (x)
(create "fn" (lambda () x)))
- or
(create "x" nil
"fn" (lambda () x)))
depending on the JS semantics you want to get.
vsevolod
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Canhua <[email protected]> wrote:
> hi, all, I found that
> (create "fn" (let ((x))
> (lambda () x)))
>
> compiles to
> { 'fn' : (x = null, function () {
> return x;
> }) }
>
> wherein the variable x may conflict with a variable with the same name
> outside this code.
> How may avoid this? How may I achieve "let over lambda" closure effect
> as in common lisp?
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
_______________________________________________
parenscript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
