To follow up on this, the recent patches (specifically ae093417db848a) should now somewhat correctly "expressionize" loops (some work remains on returning actually useful values), and solve this problem.
Vladimir On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Gackle <[email protected]> wrote: > < Well there's no reason not to wrap it in a lambda > > > Do you mean that PS can detect when the LOOP form is being used as an > expression and turn it into one with a lambda? That would be great. > > I hope you don't mean lambdifying all ordinary vanilla loops, though. That > would be not great :) > > Dan > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Vladimir Sedach <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Well there's no reason not to wrap it in a lambda, so I'm going to >> classify this as a bug. >> >> > Is there something that can help to convert js code to parenscript code? >> >> Red Daly has https://github.com/gonzojive/js-to-parenscript >> >> Vladimir >> >> _______________________________________________ >> parenscript-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
