Vladmir, thank you so much for your effort. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Vladimir Sedach <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Canhua, > > I tried to introduce pretty printing for JavaScript object literals in > patch 60154a465a5a29b4b5136f87f6c572f1da04ce4a, but unfortunately that > broke Parenscript output in some cases (see this old email thread for > details: > http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/parenscript-devel/2012-May/001130.html). > > I didn't see a good way to fix things, but if anyone has suggestions > for introducing JS literal pretty-printing I am very open to adding > it. > > Thank you, > Vladimir > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Canhua <[email protected]> wrote: >> hi, I think it would be nice to read if parenscript >> compiler pretty-print json object in the output, in >> particular properly indent it, rather than print it on >> one line like right now. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> parenscript-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
_______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
