Will Coleda wrote: > > Ah. I saw that in the parrotinterpreter PMC, but didn't even think to > try it since it was declared outside of the pmclass definition, and > didn't have a METHOD on it. Thanks.
Hrm, legacy code. It should probably be updated to a normal METHOD. Allison _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
