On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Andrew Whitworth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Will Coleda <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ah, thank you. >> >> My first joking response was going to be: "That's far too simple, >> it'll never work. ;)"; I apparently jinxed myself. >> >> I tested it and it doesn't seem to work; the override isn't invoked; >> This prints out '0' and nothing else. (using does_pmc instead has the >> same non-effect). > > The VTABLE_does in src/pmc/class.pmc currently doesn't look for a PIR > override. Instead it dispatches the request directly to the associated > class object. > > Do we want this to be overridable from PIR? If so, I'll throw together > a fix to call the PIR override if available, and fall back to current > semanics otherwise. > > --Andrew Whitworth > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev >
Yes please. This is blocking development in partcl. -- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
