On Tue Jul 04 19:30:44 2006, [email protected] wrote: > IMCC currently relies on a lot of static globals to carry state, and > cannot reliably restore them when an error occurs. (grep for > "static" and "FIXME global" in the IMCC tree.) > > Allison had ruled that reentrancy should be possible for IMCC, and > this would be a good refactoring project.
We've rejected a lot of "clean up IMCC" tickets with the thought that we eventually want PIRC to take over. Anyone think this falls into the same category? -- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
