On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:32 PM, chromatic <[email protected]> wrote: > To make the jump from 2.0 to 2.5 in six months work, we have to say, *right > now*, that one of the releases will contain only "minor improvements", > whatever that means.
Again, to reiterate my earlier points and support what c is saying, we shouldn't want to say "let's hope we aren't that lucky". If we get into such a situation where a major change has to get numbered as if it's a minor one just to preserve sanity, we've destroyed any correlation between an X.Y.Z system and our position that Y represents major monthly updates. If anything, we should not only anticipate a situation where we do get 6 consecutive major releases, we should be doing everything we can to make it a reality. --Andrew Whitworth _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
