On Mon Feb 23 10:55:20 2009, Whiteknight wrote: > On Mon Feb 23 10:25:46 2009, Whiteknight wrote: > > Okay, I took a quick stab at this today, removing that section where the > > variables were initialized to 888. On my system several new test > > failures appear without this (which indicates to me that somebody is > > relying on these lousy initialization values. Here is the list of tests > > that my system says are failing now: > > > > t/pmc/class.t:22-23 > > t/pmc/exceptionhandler.t:7 > > t/pmc/hash.t:99 > > t/pmc/managedstruct:8 > > t/compilers/pge/06-grammar.t:1-16 > > Okay, t/pmc/class.t and t/pmc/hash.t were both failing because of typos, > so I've fixed them in r36943 and r36944. The rest of them are failing > for les obvious reasons and I don't have time till later to really dig > into them. >
Parrot 1.0 has come and gone... -- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
