I think coke was implying that the results scrolled off the screen :-}
I tend to log the results as in:
make fulltest_all 2>&1 | tee fulltest_all.38266.log
then load the log into Kate and search for 'Result: '
I got similar results at r38266 earlier on Ubuntu Intrepid i386
except for make testj:
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/op/trans.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 22 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 13
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=252, Tests=8237, 295 wallclock secs ( 2.30 usr 0.62 sys + 71.89 cusr
31.02 csys = 105.83 CPU)
Result: FAIL
which passes if I apply rg's patch in TT#530
make examples gave the same results
however at r38239 I get:
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/examples/pod.t (Wstat: 8192 Tests: 170 Failed: 32)
Failed tests: 4, 9-10, 80-83, 85, 87, 89-96, 98, 100-101
103, 105-106, 108-110, 112, 117-119, 121
147
Non-zero exit status: 32
Files=12, Tests=421, 281 wallclock secs ( 0.19 usr 0.06 sys + 21.17 cusr
5.70 csys = 27.12 CPU)
Result: FAIL
make: *** [examples_tests] Error 1
I am looking into that at the moment.
Cheers, Michael (mikehh)
2009/4/21 James E Keenan <[email protected]>
> Will Coleda wrote:
>
>
>> Please remember to either use 'make fulltest' or, if running 'make
>> fulltest_all', to actually go back through and check the output, since
>> fulltest_all actually ignores return values from the various
>> harnesses, and theoretically always exits with a "success" return
>> value.
>>
>>
> Coke:
>
> What then are we to make of this 'make fulltest_all' output I got this
> morning: http://nopaste.snit.ch/16326
>
> It clearly recorded two FAILs for harnesses.
>
> Or are we talking about different things?
>
> kid51
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
>
--
Michael H. Hind
Tel: +44 (0) 1224 631 581
Cell: +44 (0) 7877 224 745
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
