Will Coleda wrote:
I wrote a program (tools/dev/branch_status.pl) to give us some summary
information about existing branches, and put the output up at
Coke:
This was not passing t/codingstd/perlcritic.t. However, by applying the
following patch, I was able to get it to pass:
Index: tools/dev/branch_status.pl
===================================================================
--- tools/dev/branch_status.pl (revision 38625)
+++ tools/dev/branch_status.pl (working copy)
@@ -8,11 +8,9 @@
=cut
-## Modern::Perl (doesn't pass perlcritic)
-use 5.010_000;
+use v5.10.0;
use strict;
use warnings;
-use feature();
use XML::Twig;
use Perl6::Form;
I think this is more a bug in Perl::Critic than in perlcritic.t. Cf.:
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=45892.
I could not completely test this fix, however, because I was unable to
install XML::Twig on either Linux or Darwin. That, in turn, was not a
problem in XML::Twig, but an inability to install XML::Parser v2.36 on
either OS!
Can you verify that my fix does not breach branch_status.pl?
Thank you very much.
kid51
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
