On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Andrew Whitworth<[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Will Coleda<[email protected]> wrote: >> This branch causes quite a few failures for partcl. >> >> Some of them seem to be issues that have already been resolved in >> trunk, including having TclInts change into TclFloats, namespace >> pollution... I don't see any merges in from trunk since the branch was >> created, so this is hopefully just a matter of merging trunk into the >> branch, which is probably a good idea to do before asking for non-core >> testing anyway. > > I merged trunk into branch so we could try to get benefit from some of > the improvements that have been made to trunk since the branch > started. There are some packfile-related failures because we bumped > PBC_COMPAT and we're fixing that now. Could you do me a favor and run > the tests again with trunk and branch at r39444, which is when I > merged? that should show a pretty even footing.
trunk @39444 == trunk @39443 > Does TCL use FileHandle and subclasses of it, or does it use other > custom types for IO? > > --Andrew Whitworth > partcl isn't using any custom IO (yet). Everything is, I think, just straight opcodes. Branch now completes. 'prove' results: Files=70, Tests=1257, 215 wallclock secs ( 0.30 usr 0.37 sys + 195.62 cusr 9.39 csys = 205.68 CPU) Result: FAIL So, that's 215s now in branch vs. 221s a few hours ago in trunk. (only ran 'prove' once each time) -- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
