On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:40:37PM -0400, Austin Hastings wrote: > In addition, PCT is exactly the kind of thing Close is > aimed at: code that's too low-level to write in Perl/NQP, and that's too > high-level to write in PIR.(*)
FWIW, I fully expect (and intend) that PCT will eventually be written in NQP, and that NQP will be sufficiently advanced to handle it. If you've found a place where NQP fundamentally _wouldn't_ be able to do it, I'd be curious to know about it. (I fully grant that NQP can't do it in its present form, but I don't see why it's fundamentally unable to do it.) Pm _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
