On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, James E Keenan wrote:
1. Discussion of the benefits of adding any particular library to our
"standard set" should also include any disadvantages or risks that that
addition may pose. Potential downsides would include: More complexity in
configuration? Slows down the executables? Bigger memory footprint?
Hmm. Have we also considered Larry's reasons for including as little
as possible[*] in the Perl6 standard libraries? Not that I'm saying we have
to go with this, just that it might be a thought.
[*] FSVO "little" and "possible"
:)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| Name: Tim Nelson | Because the Creator is, |
| E-mail: [email protected] | I am |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version 3.12
GCS d+++ s+: a- C++$ U+++$ P+++$ L+++ E- W+ N+ w--- V-
PE(+) Y+>++ PGP->+++ R(+) !tv b++ DI++++ D G+ e++>++++ h! y-
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
