On Fri Oct 03 14:58:28 2008, rgrjr wrote: > Invoking the attached test case fails in the following way: > > rog...@rgr> ./parrot test-exception-pc.pir > too few arguments passed (1) - 2 params expected > current instr.: 'main' pc 9 (test-exception-pc.pir:3) > rog...@rgr> > > The problem is that pc 9/line 3 is the location of the invokecc > instruction that calls the erring test sub, not the location of the > get_results instruction where the problem is detected. I'm not sure how > to fix this, because it messes greatly with the modularity of how return > addresses are tracked. > > But I think it really ought to be fixed before the next release -- > that or the arg-checking requirement for exception handlers should be > relaxed, at least temporarily. I stumbled onto this when Kea-CL fell > afoul of the exception handling arg change introduced in r31294 (about > which I don't recall seeing any mention on the list). Because of the > misplaced error message, it took me a while to track it down. > > -- Bob >
Bob - I can no longer duplicate the original intent of this ticket, as the sample segfaults - when I try to cleanup the sample to avoid the segfault, I don't get any line number errors. If you can duplicate the original line # error, please open a new trac ticket at https://trac.parrot.org/ I've opened the segfault as https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1027 and added a TODO test to track it in t/compilers/imcc/syn/regressions.t -- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
