On Tue Sep 16 13:26:41 2008, [email protected] wrote: > Will Coleda (via RT) wrote: > [...] > > > > I would expect one of the following things to happen here, either: > > > > - an error is generated when test2 is parsed because there is no name > > for the named parameter, or > > - test2's blarg .param should default to being named 'blarg', so both > > calls should work identically. > > > > Even more confusing, this code: > > Yes, we need better error checking and better error reporting in named > argument handling. We need a general invocation refactor, but can do it > in small stages. > > Let's go with defaulting to the same name as the .param on the bare :named. > > Allison >
This issue is now being tracked in https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1152 -- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
