CC'ing final response to list. On Mon Nov 16 19:28:56 2009, pmichaud wrote: > PAST (and Rakudo) have managed to live quite nicely without 'property' > scope for PAST::Var; given PCT's bias towards only adding features as > they are needed, we'll reject the ticket for now. > > The issues about lvalue support for properties may make some sense, but > that should be done as part of an overall rethink of lvalues, and not > directly in PAST. > > If/when property support is to be discussed again, we can do it in a > Trac ticket or the mailing lists. > > Thanks! > > Pm
-- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
