On Tue Jul 15 13:15:46 2008, cotto wrote: > On Wed Jul 09 00:04:45 2008, [email protected] wrote: > > r29183 adds a test to t/pmc/array.t that exposes some brokenness in > > the Array > > PMC's freeze/thaw code path. I added the test because it looked like > > Array's > > freeze/thaw/visit code had no test coverage. It turns out that > > list_visit > > also never gets called (at least according to make cover). I don't > > have the > > tuits to fix this for now, hence the ticket and the failing test. > > > > To repo, just prove t/pmc/array.t. If everything passes, you win! > > (from #ps today) > As a note to whomever fixes this, the sparseness of the Array PMC is its > only remaining useful feature. Fixing freeze/thaw/visit is valuable > because it will make implementing sparseness in > {Fixed|Resizable}{PMC|Integer|Boolean|Float|String}Array easier. Once > those PMCs are sparse, the Array PMC can go away.
This issue is now being tracked at https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1293; followups there. -- Will "Coke" Coleda _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
