On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Perry Wagle <[email protected]> wrote:
> find_name (ie, Parrot_find_name_op()) doesn't have a code path to throw an 
> exception if the name is not bound.  It just returns NULL.
>
> I was invited to repair that, but if I did, all the code that depending on 
> the default behavior not being as documented (its supposed to throw an 
> exception on unbound) would now barf.  I expect that to be a lot.
>
> How should that be handled?

You should open a ticket for the bug. That will ensure that we don't
forget about it, and if you have a fix please attach it to the ticket
as well, so that we can evaluate it's impact.

Personally, I would consider this a bugfix and fix the code that
relies on this bug to follow the new, correct, behavior. On the other
hand the change might require a deprecation notice to be added, which
would delay the fix going in, but (as the OrderedHash revamp showed)
that can be done now in a branch and merged after the next deprecation
boundary. Hopefully, the shorter time between supported releases will
play in our favor in this case.

Either way, please open a Trac ticket.

Daniel Arbelo Arrocha.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev

Reply via email to