On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 07:42, Peter Lobsinger <[email protected]> wrote: > In that case, a similar argument can be made for an interface that > uses a void *[] or callbacks. Works from C, takes C datatypes, gives a > logical place to transition between managed/unmanaged code. > c++ compilers hate void *. please avoid the construct wherever possible. _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
- Re: Calling functions whose signature/arguments are only ... Jonathan Leto
- Re: Calling functions whose signature/arguments are ... Allison Randal
- Re: Calling functions whose signature/arguments ... Peter Lobsinger
- Re: Calling functions whose signature/arguments are only ... Peter Lobsinger
- Re: Calling functions whose signature/arguments are ... Andrew Whitworth
- Re: Calling functions whose signature/arguments ... Peter Lobsinger
- Re: Calling functions whose signature/argume... Andrew Whitworth
- Re: Calling functions whose signature/ar... Peter Lobsinger
- Re: Calling functions whose signatu... Andrew Whitworth
- Re: Calling functions whose signatu... Joshua Tolley
- Re: Calling functions whose signatu... jerry gay
