On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 07:58:59AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > Even so, getting the optimization language ideal (or at least, correct) is > beyond what I expect from Tyler as part of his project. If his design works > out well, we can modify that language as necessary; it's just matching nodes > and branches.
I totally agree about the project scope -- I'm more interested in seeing what's possible in the design as opposed to spending a lot of time on syntax. My point is just that there needs to be *some* syntax that goes beyond what PIR provides. Pm _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
