The Capture PMC consists of an array and a hash, to which it delegates array-related and hash-related vtables. Is there any reason why it should not "provide" the "array" and "hash" roles? If not, I'm going to making such a change in my GSoC branch(in order to facilitate some changes that will help generalize the PAST::* libraries I've been developing so that bacek's PIR compiler can use them). There are other ways I could implement it, but the most straightforward would require Capture to provide both "array" and "hash".
-- Tyler Curtis _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
