Howdy, +1 to converting all references to open TTs in our codebase to open GH issue #s.
I am fine with leaving closed TT references alone (such as tests which were named after the closed TT that they fix). Duke On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Brian Gernhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Andy Lester wrote: > >> >> On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Brian Gernhardt wrote: >> >>> Do we have a list of TT# to GH# ? It would be nice to add links from each >>> trac issue to the new github one. It would be even better if this was an >>> automated process. >> >> Trac is read-only from here on out. There are no references to GH from TT, >> nor will there be. >> >> Do you have bookmarks to Trac tickets? > > It's not bookmarks that I'm worried about, but the pile of references to TTs > in our code, blogs, etc etc. While we should update as many as we can, it > would be nice if existent links would point to the new information instead of > just being dead. > > ~~ benabik > > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev -- Jonathan "Duke" Leto <[email protected]> Leto Labs LLC 209.691.DUKE // http://labs.leto.net NOTE: Personal email is only checked twice a day at 10am/2pm PST, please call/text for time-sensitive matters. _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
