On 5/5/12 7:53 AM, Will Coleda wrote:
We've been saying for years now that users shouldn't use PASM, but PIR
(and lately, a push to NQP or winxed instead of PIR). Are any of our
users currently using PASM?
Moritz, JimmyZ, Whiteknight, and I are investigating what a parrot
without PASM looks like in the coke/rm_pasm branch.
So far for this branch:
* parrot will no longer try to parse foo.pasm as a PASM file.
* t/ tests that happen to use PASM are being rewritten in PIR
* t/ tests that test PASM itself are being dropped
* generated constant files are now PIR instead of PASM - drop in
replacement except for s/.pasm/.pir/
* some doc updates
Still to come:
* more work to be done updating t/
* more doc updates
* convert/drop any remaining .pasm files
* remove PASM compiler from IMCC
But PASM opcodes will remain valid in PIR, right?
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
