Hello. What about tristate cmp and trilabel jmpif? :)
(Half jocking there) Bacek On May 25, 2012 8:55 PM, "kjstol" <[email protected]> wrote: > hi there, > > I'm making nice progress on M1, the C-like language that compiles to M0. > However, I'm missing an essential op in M0, which is a comparison op > like < or >. At least one of them is necessary in order to implement > the <, >, <=, >= operators. the unary minus (-x) also could use it, > but adding a "neg" opcode would be sufficient for that of course. > > So, the request is to add at least 1 op to M0, namely either ">" or > "<". (gt, lt). Both is preferable, but if it's essential to keep the > number of ops to a minimum, then 1 is fine. (One could argue that we > could get rid of "mul_i" as that can be implemented by repeatedly > adding... :-) > > best regards, > kjs > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev >
_______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
