On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So, in short, we don't really treat them substantially different. We
>> did reject the deprecations part of the support policy, and using
>> supported releases as a deprecation boundary was really their biggest
>> purpose for a while. Without that, there isn't a "real" substantive
>> difference. [...]
>>
>> Just because we don't treat them any differently doesn't mean that we
>> couldn't or even that we shouldn't. If Rakudo would like a particular
>> behavior with respect to supported releases, we can definitely talk
>> about implementing that.
>
> Rakudo doesn't have any specific needs in this area; what we have
> now is working fine.  I just wanted to know about Parrot's directions
> in this area.
>
> I also suspect that distribution packagers (e.g. Debian) will want to
> have some guideline for identifying Parrot's "stable" releases that
> they should choose when preparing packages for inclusion in OS
> repositories.  As it is now, I think the Debian packagers always
> choose Parrot's "supported" releases, and then pick a corresponding
> Rakudo from that.
>
> Based on your message, I'm guessing that Rakudo should always
> list the "oldest workable version" of Parrot as its PARROT_REVISION.
> This means that Rakudo 2012.07 may end up listing Parrot 4.4.0 as
> its "minimum version", although we'll certainly test it against
> Parrot 4.6.0 when it comes out in a couple of weeks.
>
> Of course, if anything happens whereby we find that Rakudo/NQP
> absolutely require a Parrot newer than 4.4.0, we'll bump the next
> PARROT_REVISION to 4.6.0 automatically.

As parrot 4.6.0 does not include any new features (no io_cleanup1, no threads)
you can keep depending on 4.4.0 in your tools/build/PARROT_REVISION.
moritz already changed that in https://github.com/perl6/nqp/commit/8cbe162109

So 4.6.0 is pretty "stable", not a lot of changes, only some minor fixes.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://cpanel.net/   http://www.perl-compiler.org/
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev

Reply via email to