On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:45:29PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Wednesday 20 June 2012 12:35:14 Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > > This is my current hunch. If you can provide the full output of > > > "parrot_config --dump" on the porterbox, that may be able to tell us > > > what we need to know to fix this. > > > > Well, the ia64 porterbox has sysctl, and that may explain why I wasn't able > > to reproduce it. But it still sounds quite weird... > > Another thing to try is to replace the call to sysctl with 'uname -r'. > > It does give the same information. uname is part of coreutils package which > is > of 'required' priority so it should be present in buildd chroots. > > Unless you object, I'll try that this afternoon.
No objections from me. I just realised I didn't push the last parrot uploads to git, which I have just done. So if you haven't done so yet, you can get the latest package from here [0]. Also, sorry for not being much active lately, but I'm in the middle of a pretty busy period university-wise. Cheers [0] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-parrot/parrot.git;a=summary -- perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
